Skip to main content
· 10/7/2013

McDonald v. Vill. of Palatine

Citations

  • 134 S. Ct. 351
  • 187 L. Ed. 2d 244
  • 82 U.S.L.W. 3189
  • 571 U.S. 934
  • 2013 WL 4456684
  • 2013 U.S. LEXIS 6871

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the level of scrutiny applied to gun control regulations depends on the regulation’s burden on the Second Amendment right to keep and to bear arms
  • noting that temporal proximity between adverse actions and protected activities is a “fact-intensive analysis.”
  • applying a “substantial burden” test to determine whether to apply heightened scrutiny to county ordinance
  • applying a “substantial burden” test to determine whether to apply heightened scrutiny to county ordinance
  • In “a variety of contexts” the Supreme Court “applies mere rational basis scrutiny to laws that regulate, but do not significantly burden, fundamental rights.”
  • Gould J., concurring in part, \would subject to heightened scrutiny only arms regulations falling within the core purposes of the Second Amendment\ and \would subject incidental burdens on the Second Amendment right ... to reasonableness review\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.