McDonald v. Sundstrom

Citations

• 31 Pa. Super. 241
• 1906 Pa. Super. LEXIS 197

Syllabus

<p>Contract — Evidence—Witnesses—Opinion.</p> <p>In an action to recover the price of a quantity of crushed limestone, witnesses were called who showed that they had had actual experience in the use of concrete materials, although they were not familiar with the theory of combination by percentages. They testified as to their actual experience and the result secured by combining crushed stone with cement mixtures to fill voids. Held, that the testimony of these witnesses were properly admitted.</p>