Skip to main content
· 5/13/2002

McDonald v. Southern Farm Bureau Life Insurance

Citations

  • 291 F.3d 718
  • 27 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2967
  • 89 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 2472
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 9110
  • 2002 WL 975874

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that FICA provides no private right of action and explaining the remedies available to an employee who incorrectly paid an employer’s share of FICA taxes
  • explaining the FICA tax scheme, which requires employers to share the FICA tax liabilities of their employees but not of their independent contractors
  • considering whether an individual has an implied right of action
  • “In the absence of any textual, structural, or historical reason to believe that Congress intended to allow a private right of action, and in the face of administrative procedures indicating that it did not, we hold that no private right of action may be implied under FICA.”
  • describing the FICA tax generally

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barkett, Marcus, Schlesinger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.