McDonald v. Mazda Motors of America, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “When the purchaser returns the product to the dealer and makes the product available for repair, refusal to repair, unsuccessful repair, or repeated failures of the repair constitute a breach of the express warranty .”
• expert testimony not required to prove defect in rattling car engine when an average person would know a new car is not supposed to make loud rattling noises.
• “When a defect in the product exists, the manufacturer and seller are liable strictly in warranty, without evidence of fault or knowledge, where the breach of warranty conditions are satisfied.”
• “When the purchaser returns the product to the dealer and makes the product available for repair, refusal to repair, unsuccessful repair, or repeated failures of the repair constitute a breach of the express warranty.”
• no breach of warranty if defect is cured
• warrantor must have notice of defect

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).