Skip to main content
· 3/14/2000

McDonald v. City of Prescott

Citations

  • 5 P.3d 900
  • 197 Ariz. 566
  • 5 P.2d 900
  • 317 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 23
  • 2000 Ariz. App. LEXIS 40

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that although a police officer is generally not responsible for road maintenance per se, when an officer opts to provide police protection he has a duty to act as would reasonably prudent officers in the same circumstances
  • law enforcement agency acquired duty to remove hazards on road because agency routinely undertook that responsibility
  • law enforcement agency acquired duty to remove hazards on road because agency routinely undertook that responsibility
  • law enforcement agency acquired duty to remove hazards on road because agency routinely undertook that responsibility

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Weisberg, Noyes, Grant

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.