McDevitt v. Thomas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding “it necessarily follows that a plaintiff who cannot prove conversion also cannot prove statutory theft”
• dismissing a claim for statutory theft because plaintiff had not adequately alleged conversion, and the statutory theft claim arose out of the same facts and were based upon the alleged conversion
• dismissing statutory theft claim involving breach of executory contract to make future transfers of company ownership interests because plaintiff failed to allege facts showing property in plaintiff’s possession capable of conversion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).