Skip to main content
· 6/20/1938

McDermott v. New York Dock Railway

Citations

  • 97 F.2d 1008
  • 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 3981

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that \the only controversy is whether the [challenged] report was adequate and what kind of information must be provided in future reports\
  • applying 10 Franklin’s standard for injunctive relief against the President to mandamus relief against the 11 President
  • clarifying “congressional reporting requirements are, and heretofore have been, a management tool employed by Congress for its own purposes” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.