· 5/15/1932
McDermott v. Fisher-Williams Corp.
Citations
- 235 A.D. 854
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- upholding trial court’s exclusion of defendant’s expert witness testimony on identifications in part because “defendant was not a stranger to either [witness]”
- upholding trial court’s exclusion of defendant’s expert witness testimony on identifications in part because “defendant was not a stranger to either [witness]”
- counterintuitive that accuracy of eyewitness identification may be adversely affected by, inter alia, event stress, weapon focus, cross-racial identification and witness confidence
- counterintuitive that accuracy of eyewitness identification may be adversely affected by, inter alia, event stress, weapon focus, cross-racial identification and witness confidence
- eyewitness ‘‘had seen and heard [the] defendant in the neighborhood regularly over a period of six months before the robbery’’
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.