Skip to main content
· 5/15/1932

McDermott v. Fisher-Williams Corp.

Citations

  • 235 A.D. 854

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding trial court’s exclusion of defendant’s expert witness testimony on identifications in part because “defendant was not a stranger to either [witness]”
  • upholding trial court’s exclusion of defendant’s expert witness testimony on identifications in part because “defendant was not a stranger to either [witness]”
  • counterintuitive that accuracy of eyewitness identification may be adversely affected by, inter alia, event stress, weapon focus, cross-racial identification and witness confidence
  • counterintuitive that accuracy of eyewitness identification may be adversely affected by, inter alia, event stress, weapon focus, cross-racial identification and witness confidence
  • eyewitness ‘‘had seen and heard [the] defendant in the neighborhood regularly over a period of six months before the robbery’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.