McDermott v. Carnahan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an appellate court “is concerned primarily with reaching a correct result, and thus ... need not agree with the reasoning of the trial court in order to affirm the result”
• inmate’s claims that parole regulations were unconstitutional were denied because they were based on inmate’s false theory that statute granted him parole eligibility

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).