Skip to main content
· 1/6/1993

McDermott International, Inc. v. Underwriters at Lloyds Subscribing to Memorandum of Insurance No. 104207

Citations

  • 981 F.2d 744
  • 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 121
  • 1993 WL 1867

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • considering cases a single judicial unit if they are consolidated “for disposition” or “for all purposes” rather than “for limited purposes”
  • considering cases a single judicial unit if they are consolidated \for disposition\ or \for all purposes\ rather than \for limited purposes\
  • “This court has recognized that [mandamus review of an order compelling arbitration] may be available [but] McDermott has failed to satisfy [the] demanding standard.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jones, Barksdale

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.