Skip to main content
· 10/3/1991

McDermott International, Inc. v. Lloyds Underwriters of London

Citations

  • 944 F.2d 1199
  • 1991 WL 194767

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding plaintiff’s ability to hold two previous jobs with a fair amount of success 4 supported finding plaintiff was not disabled
  • observations of ALJ during the hearing, along with other 20 evidence, is substantial evidence for rejecting testimony
  • the ALJ reasonably rejected the claimant’s allegations of severe and disabling pain, because, among other things, the claimant “neither takes medicine nor undergoes treatment for pain”
  • an applicant 11 seeking benefits under the Social Security Act must show she suffers an impairment 12 resulting from “anatomical, physiological, or psychological abnormalities that are 13 demonstrable by medically acceptable clinical and laboratory diagnostic techniques”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jones, Reavley, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.