McDavid v. Arthur

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]o allow an ADA plaintiff to bring a claim based on the same conduct under § 1983 is counter to Congress's intent, because it effectively allows a plaintiff two bites at the apple.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).