McDaniels v. Drew

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “section 1960 defines ‘money transmitting’ broadly” and holding that the district court should have included Velastegui’s definition in § 1960 jury instructions
• noting that \ section 1960 defines 'money transmitting' broadly\ and holding that the district court should have included Velastegui's definition in § 1960 jury instructions
• defining “business” under § 1960 as “an enterprise that is carried on for profit or financial gain”
• examining record for prosecutorial misconduct that is \so severe and significant\ as to deny right to fair trial (quoting United States v. Locascio , 6 F.3d 924 , 945 (2d Cir. 1993) )
• “[T]he execution of money transfers from the United States to Iran on behalf of another, whether or not performed for a fee, constitutes the exportation of a service.”
• “ ‘We will reverse on the ground of prosecutorial misconduct only if that misconduct caused substantial prejudice by so infecting the trial with unfairness as to make the resulting conviction a denial of due process.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).