· 10/10/1960
McDaniel v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California
Citations
- 364 U.S. 849
- 81 S. Ct. 95
- 5 L. Ed. 2d 73
- 1960 U.S. LEXIS 702
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming district court’s “refusal to exercise [supplemental] jurisdiction over a state law claim after dismissal of all federal claims prior to trial.”
- stating the standard as a reasonable person “knowing all the circumstances”
- not- ing that dismissal of state claims for lack of jurisdiction must be without prejudice
- \The Constitution does not create fundamental interests in particular types of employment.\
- “The Constitution does not create fundamental interests in particular types of employment.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.