McDaniel v. THE STATE

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that trial court’s factual findings and credibility determinations must be accepted unless they are clearly erroneous
• noting that trial court’s factual findings and credibility determinations must be accepted unless they are clearly erroneous
• noting that trial court’s factual findings and credibility determinations must be accepted unless they are clearly erroneous
• failure to proffer negates claim that trial counsel was ineffective in not producing expert rebuttal witness
• where defendant fails to proffer testimony of an uncalled witness, he cannot prove that there is a reasonable probability that the trial would have ended differently
• “decisions on . . . whether and how to conduct cross examinations, and all other strategies and tactical decisions are the exclusive province of the lawyer after consultation with his client”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).