Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2/1/1988
McDaniel v. State
Citations
- 294 Ark. 416
- 743 S.W.2d 795
- 1988 Ark. LEXIS 70
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- failure to identify informant was not prejudicial to defense where there was no evidence that the informant participated in the crime, was a witness to the crime, or possessed any exculpatory evidence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Purtle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Moore v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1988-12-12· cited 41×
- Eastin v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2007-05-10· cited 33×
- Kincannon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 2004-03-03· cited 14×
- Ray Eugene McDaniel v. Larry Norris, Acting Director, Arkansas Department of CorrectionsEighth Circuit· 1995-01-05· cited 4×
- Thompson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1989-05-01· cited 3×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 2012-02-08· cited 1×
- Warrior v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1989-07-03
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1957-03-25· cited 3,599×
- Berry v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1986-11-03· cited 88×
- Price v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1980-04-28· cited 68×
- Perry v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1973-10-29· cited 46×
- Parker v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1980-04-21· cited 37×
- Vasquez v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1985-12-23· cited 35×
- McFadden v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1986-10-20· cited 26×
- Henderson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1987-02-02· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.