McDaniel v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “because the state did not lay a sufficient traditional evidentiary predicate, the trial court erred in allowing . . . the results of the . . . test” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Devin Jay Hardman v. The State of Wyoming
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 2020-01-24· cited 7×
• Ewing v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2001-09-28· cited 3×
• M.T.S. v. State
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 2000-06-30· cited 1×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Moore v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1983-11-29· cited 21×
• Britton v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1993-09-30· cited 21×
• Gwarjanski v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1996-12-20· cited 17×
• Ex Parte Curtis
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1986-12-12· cited 11×
• McDaniel v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1987-05-08· cited 10×
• Jones v. City of Summerdale
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1996-05-24· cited 1×