McDaniel v. McDaniel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• facts which petitioner became aware of after entering default stipulation were \unknown\
• facts which petitioner became aware of after entering default stipulation were \unknown\
• irregular diet, school attendance, and marijuana exposure created sufficient risk of harm

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re the Marriage of Zigler
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2010-03-04· cited 72×
• In Re Marriage of Zigler and Sidwell
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2010-03-04· cited 69×
• In Re the Marriage of Timmons
  Washington Supreme Court· 1980-10-16· cited 53×
• Robertson v. Robertson
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1978-03-06· cited 20×
• Hill v. Hill
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1980-12-06· cited 17×
• Wildermuth v. Wildermuth
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1975-11-17· cited 16×
• State v. Colwash
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1976-05-25· cited 16×
• In Re the Marriage of Verbin
  Washington Supreme Court· 1979-05-24· cited 13×
• Silver Surprize, Inc. v. Sunshine Mining Co.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1976-03-04· cited 11×
• In Re the Marriage of Zander
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1985-02-14· cited 9×
• In Re the Marriage of Raugust
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1981-04-21· cited 5×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Rankin v. Ferriter
  Washington Supreme Court· 1969-08-14· cited 51×
• Weber v. Weber
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1972-04-17· cited 11×
• Mooney v. American Mail Line, Ltd.
  Washington Supreme Court· 1963-01-03· cited 7×
• Lahart v. Lahart
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1975-05-08· cited 2×