Skip to main content
· 2/16/2010

McDaniel v. County of Schenectady

Citations

  • 595 F.3d 411
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 2922
  • 2010 WL 520899

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that, in Goldberger, the Court “declined to ‘junk’ the lodestar method in favor of the presumptive or exclusive use of the percentage method”
  • noting that the Second Circuit upheld a fee award with no multiplier where district court praised counsel as “cream of the profession”
  • noting that a presumptively reasonable fee represents an approximation of “what a competitive market would bear”
  • noting that a presumptively reasonable fee represents an approximation of “what a competitive market would bear”
  • holding courts may award attorney's fees in common fund cases under either the lodestar or percentage method
  • noting that a district court’s determination that a case was “an ordinary civil rights case in which liability appeared] reasonably certain” was not clearly erroneous

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Walker, Livingston, Kaplan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.