McCutchen v. Hill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a sheriff is “liable for the acts of his deputies . . . ‘[i]f the act from which the injury resulted was an official act’” (quoting Chaudoin v. Fuller, 67 Ariz. 144, 149–50 (1948))
• technical deficiencies in proof are not one of the eight grounds which warrant the grant of a new trial under Rule 59(a)
• technical deficiencies in proof are not one of the eight grounds which warrant the grant of a new trial under Rule 59(a)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).