· 7/13/1990
McCune v. Neitzel
Citations
- 457 N.W.2d 803
- 235 Neb. 754
- 1990 Neb. LEXIS 217
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- due to interests involved in defamation action and difficulty of proof, amount of damages is almost entirely in jury’s discretion
- “In a suit for slander per se, no proof of any actual harm to reputation or any other damage is required for the recovery of either nominal or substantial damages.”
- “In a suit for slander per se, no proof of any actual harm to reputation or any other damage is required for the recovery of either nominal or substantial damages.”
- listing damages that can be recovered in defamation ac tion
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hastings, Boslaugh, White, Caporale, Shanahan, Grant, Fahrnbruch
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.