Skip to main content
· 7/13/1990

McCune v. Neitzel

Citations

  • 457 N.W.2d 803
  • 235 Neb. 754
  • 1990 Neb. LEXIS 217

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • due to interests involved in defamation action and difficulty of proof, amount of damages is almost entirely in jury’s discretion
  • “In a suit for slander per se, no proof of any actual harm to reputation or any other damage is required for the recovery of either nominal or substantial damages.”
  • “In a suit for slander per se, no proof of any actual harm to reputation or any other damage is required for the recovery of either nominal or substantial damages.”
  • listing damages that can be recovered in defamation ac tion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hastings, Boslaugh, White, Caporale, Shanahan, Grant, Fahrnbruch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.