McCullough, Joshua Steven

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• examining 25 whether a class of workers was “engage[d] in the movement of goods in interstate commerce in the same way that seamen and railroad workers are” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
• declining to adopt the Lenz factors even to assess the question for which they were designed because “[n]o other circuit has adopted this test” and “it unduly adds to the complexity of the analysis”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).