McCullar v. UNIV. UNDERWRITERS LIFE INS.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a nonmovant at summary-judgment stage has the \burden of proving how information from [documents sought in discovery] is crucial to her case\
• plurality opinion of three Justices, but all six remaining Justices concurred in the result, thus joining in the decision for prospective relief only
• “[W]e hold that the State Insurance Department’s interpretation of its Regulation 28, as enforced by the State Banking Department via that Department’s Rule 4(a
• nonmovant at summary-judgment stage has the 'burden of proving how information from [documents sought in discovery] is crucial to her case'

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).