McCuiston v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• sentencing as an habitual offender constitutes a clear and convincing reason for departing from the guidelines

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• McCuiston v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1988-11-17· cited 38×
• McCuiston v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-05-29· cited 18×
• Fleming v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-01-03· cited 11×
• White v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-01-08· cited 6×
• Rasul v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-02-01· cited 6×
• Parker v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-06-28· cited 6×
• Deer v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-01-10· cited 5×
• Ferguson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-10-25· cited 4×
• Pope v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-09-25· cited 1×
• Smith v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-05-02· cited 1×
• Gordon v. Florida Parole Commission
  Florida Circuit Courts· 1989-10-30

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Davis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-10-17· cited 40×
• Hendrix v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-08-02· cited 39×
• Brady v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-10-05· cited 28×
• Kiser v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-08-29· cited 21×
• Smith v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-12-20· cited 10×
• Dorman v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-08-28· cited 9×