McCuen v. McCarvel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding plaintiffs could not acquire an interest adverse to the public’s easement rights prior to vacation of the town road

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Kiely v. Graves
  Washington Supreme Court· 2012-03-01· cited 27×
• Barth v. Stenwick
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2009-02-24· cited 13×
• Northern States Power Co. v. Federal Transit Administration
  Eighth Circuit· 2004-02-20· cited 10×
• Nordin v. Kuno
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-01-18· cited 8×
• Heuer v. County of Aitkin
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2002-06-25· cited 4×
• Fischer v. City of Sauk Rapids
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-11-05· cited 3×
• Lindquist v. Weber
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1987-05-05· cited 3×
• Boldt v. Roth
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2000-03-14· cited 2×
• Edgewater Cottage Ass'n, Inc. v. Watson
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1986-05-20· cited 2×
• Northern States Power Company v. Federal Transit Administration
  Eighth Circuit· 2004-02-20· cited 1×
• Love v. Burlington Northern, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1987-06-09· cited 1×
• Dale LeRoy Tiede v. County of Le Sueur, Daniel J. Sullivan, ...
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2024-05-06

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Sanborn v. Van Duyne
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1903-07-10· cited 15×
• Burns v. Plachecki
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1974-10-25· cited 12×
• Neill v. Hake
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1958-12-26· cited 11×
• Buck v. City of Winona
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1965-05-07· cited 10×