McCue v. Kansas, Department of Human Resources

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “ ‘[b]eeause of the potential for windfall, ... [the award of front pay] must be tempered’ ” and that “[t]he district court is best-equipped to equitably determine the proper amount for this award”
• “Relegating the duty of determining front pay relief to the trial judge is reasonable.... ”
• admitting evidence of employee’s sexual harassment complaint even though employer stipulated that employee engaged in protected activity because complaint was relevant to another aspect of employee’s claim
• equitable remedies include back pay and front pay, while legal remedies include compensatory and punitive damages
• “We also review the district court’s decision to limit or refusal to limit the scope of evidence for abuse of discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).