McCue v. Colantoni

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting a personal injury claim against an estate because, unlike the claim in Schloegl, the claim was brought after the limitations period for personal injury claims had expired
• rejecting a personal injury claim against an estate because, unlike the claim in Schloegl, the claim was brought after the limitations period for personal injury claims had expired
• ” A party claiming the benefit of an estoppel must prove that he reasonably relied upon representations and conduct of the party against whom the estoppel is alleged ([citation]) and did not close his eyes to the obvious ([citation])

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).