McCROSKEY, FELDMAN, COCHRANE & BROCK, PC v. WATERS

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding financial disincentive provisions valid because they were \not so overreaching that they amount to an actual restriction on the defendant’s right to practice law\
• finding financial disincentive provisions valid because they were \not so overreaching that they amount to an actual restriction on the defendant's right to practice law\
• agreement mandating that a percentage of fees obtained by a departing attorney for former firm cases be given to the firm as a way to compensate the firm for its work was found not void as against public policy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).