McCreary v. FLA. RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY AND CASUALTY JOINT UNDERWRITING ASSOCIATION

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that despite insured’s intentional act of allowing dogs to roam through neighborhood, act alleged was still an “occurrence” because resulting damage to neighbors was unintended
• declining to opine on issue raised in motion for clarification because that issue was not before the appellate court and the trial judge could be relied upon to follow the limited directives of the original opinion
• “[A]n insurer must defend a lawsuit against its insured if the underlying complaint, when fairly read, alleges facts which create potential coverage under the policy.”
• “[A]n insurer must defend a lawsuit against its insured if the underlying complaint, when fairly read, alleges facts which create potential coverage under the policy.”
• coverage clauses are construed in the broadest possible manner to effect the greatest extent of coverage

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).