McCready, Sheila v. Nicholson, R. James

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “leave to amend shall be freely given when justice 7 requires” (quotation marks omitted)
• holding that it was clearly established law that a “safety hazard in an 9 occupational area” violated prisoner’s Eighth Amendment rights
• holding that where parties do not file their motion to leave within 19 the deadline set by the court, they must “satisfy the more stringent ‘good cause’ showing 20 required under Rule 16”
• finding that Privacy Act plaintiff “should be afforded a reasonable opportunity to complete discovery before responding to the [g]overnment’s summary judgment motion”
• stating that \[t]he key limitation in the Act's definition of 'system of records' is its use of 'retrieved' \
• stating that “[t]he key limitation in the Act’s definition of ‘system of records’ is its use of ‘retrieved’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).