McCray v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• per curiam affirming with a citation to Romero as holding that Graham does not apply to a defendant eighteen years of age or older
• per curiam affirming the appellant’s sentence and citing Romero for the proposition that Graham does not apply to an eighteen-year- old defendant, “notwithstanding the juvenile nature of the defendant’s mental and emotional development”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Emmanuel Forrest Lockhart v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-12-31· cited 1×
• Akeen Kadoni Paul v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-07-22
• Travis D. Marshall v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-08-23

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Romero v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-11-16· cited 20×