McCray v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a statement was not hearsay because it was not “not offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted, rather it was offered to explain how [law enforcement] was able to make contact with [the defendant] and then with [a co- conspirator]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Zemo v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1994-09-02· cited 24×
• Ashford v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2002-09-12· cited 23×
• Shunk v. Walker
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1991-05-14· cited 13×
• Morales v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2014-08-29· cited 8×
• Watson v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1992-07-08· cited 3×
• Opn. No.
  New York Attorney General Reports· 1997-10-23
• Scott v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2025-12-17

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Katz v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
• Gillespie v. Ryan
  Supreme Court· 1988-10-03· cited 70×
• Ricks v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1988-03-04· cited 56×
• Sponick v. Detroit Police Department
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1973-08-29· cited 56×