McCray v. FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that trial court erred in granting summary judgment because the issue of a loading dock worker’s failure to check for a gap between the dock and the truck was a question for the jury
• except in “palpable and undisputed cases where reasonable minds cannot differ as to the conclusions to be reached,” the question of whether the doctrine of avoidable consequences should bar the plaintiff’s recovery is for the jury
• except in “palpable and undisputed cases where reasonable minds cannot differ as to the conclusions to be reached,” the question of whether the doctrine of avoidable consequences should bar the plaintiff’s recovery is for the jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).