Skip to main content
· 6/15/2000

McCrary v. Kansas City Southern Railroad

Citations

  • 121 F. Supp. 2d 566
  • 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17073
  • 2000 WL 1720744

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a rule 202 proceeding is not a civil action because “it asserts no claim or cause of action upon which relief can be granted
  • concluding that Rule 27 petitions “are not generally removable under § 1441.”
  • discussing Rule 202 in finding case was not removable until the plaintiff filed an original petition asserting claims
  • request for pre-action discovery pursuant to a Texas statute is “merely a pre-suit request for [disclosure] to investigate a potential claim or suit.”
  • “Rule 202 Requests are not generally removable under § 1441,” but notes at footnote 4 that: “The court makes no determination of whether Rule 202 Requests are removable pursuant to other federal statutes such as the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cobb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.