McCrainey v. Kansas City Missouri School District

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[A] plaintiff need only have a good faith, rea sonable belief that the conduct he or she opposed was prohibited by the MHRA in order to prevail on a retaliation claim.”
• an objection which \vaguely asserts that the instructions do not comply with M.A.I. without stating how they are deficient\ is insufficient to preserve specific objections for review
• “[W]here there [is] no error in the jury’s finding of liability, the plaintiff should not have to risk his verdict where the only remaining issue was with regard to punitive damages.” (alterations added)
• “While a violation of an employer’s policy may not constitute a violation of the [Missouri Human Rights Act (“MHRA”)], it would not be unreasonable under the circumstances of this case for McCrainey to believe that [supervisor’s] conduct was unlawful.”
• identifying the prima facie case requirements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).