McCracken v. Pennsylvania

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that because the claimant did not object to the introduction of the employer’s hearsay evidence before the Board, there was no error in the Board’s reliance upon that information
• allowing exclusive reliance on hearsay where claimant neither disputed evidence nor objected to it
• administrative penalty for intentional misrepresentation of amount of income earned while receiving unemployment compensation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).