Skip to main content
· 7/28/1915

McCracken v. Missouri Valley Bridge & Iron Co.

Citations

  • 96 Kan. 353
  • 150 P. 832
  • 1915 Kan. LEXIS 383

Syllabus

<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>Workmen’s Compensation Act — Judgment for Lump Sum — Appeal Dismissed for Want of Merit. An appeal from a judgment rendered under the workmen’s compensation act, awarding compensation in a lump sum to a dependent upon a workman whose death resulted from personal injuries sustained in a hazardous employment, dismissed for want of merit.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Possession of recently stolen property, accompanied by an active and hurried effort, under an assumed name, to dispose thereof, is evidence to go to the jury upon the issue of whether the accused stole the same.”
  • “Possession of recently stolen property, accompanied by an active and hurried effort, under an assumed name, to dispose thereof, is evidence to go to the jury upon the issue of whether the accused stole the same.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.