McCracken v. Fancy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 3 (0) 1947A 0 that in reviewing an unemployment benefits decision, this court determines whether the board acted arbitrarily or capriciously
• reviewing court may not substitute its judgment for that of the agency
• setting forth the standard of review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).