McCoy v. Winn Dixie Stores, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a question of fact exists as to whether plaintiff should have seen a puddle — a non-static hazard — prior to a fall
• holding that a question of fact exists as to whether plaintiff should have seen a puddle — a non- static hazard — prior to a fall
• “In this case, the evidence does not support a finding on summary judgment that the puddle was or should have been readily discernible to [plaintiff] prior to his fall.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ashman v. Marshall's of MA, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2000-05-26· cited 17×
• Johnson v. All American Quality Foods, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2017-03-10· cited 16×
• Wiley v. Liberty Southern, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2000-03-24· cited 4×
• Ingles Markets, Inc. v. Virgil R. Seymour
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2020-10-21

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Matjoulis v. Integon General Ins. Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1997-05-14· cited 645×
• Robinson v. Kroger Co.
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1997-12-03· cited 568×
• Anderson v. Reynolds
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1998-06-16· cited 14×