McCoy v. Union Elevated Railroad
Citations
- 247 U.S. 354
- 38 S. Ct. 504
- 62 L. Ed. 1156
- 1918 U.S. LEXIS 1918
Syllabus
<p>The contract clause relates to legislative, not to judicial, action im-. pairing obligation of contracts.</p> <p>In an action for damages to abutting property due to construction, maintenence and operation of an elevated railroad, in a street of which the fee was in the public, the state court held that recovery depended upon the effect on market value, in determining which increase of such value arising from increase of travel should be considered and treated, as a special benefit, though enjoyed also by . other neighboring property. Held, that there was no basis for invoking the equal protection clause, and that the ruling did not deprive of property without due process of law.</p> <p>Where private property is taken for public purposes, the fundamental right guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment is that the owner . shall not be deprived of the market value Under a pile of law. which makes it impossible for him to obtain-just compensation. There is no guarantee that the rule adopted by the State shall be the 'one - best supported by reason ór authority, or against mere errors in the course of the trial,</p> <p>It is almost- universally held that, in arriving at the amount of damages to property not taken, allowance should be made fpr peculiar and individual-benefits conferred upon it, arid it cannot be said that extension of the rule to include increase of market value resulting directly from the public improvement where all property in the’ néighborhoód is similarly benefited deprives of .the fundamental right protected by the Amendment.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- discussing property “owner’s fundamental right to just compensation” for government taking
- “In such [a] case the owner really loses nothing which he had before; and it may be said with reason, there has been no real injury”
- “In such [a] case the owner really loses nothing which he had before; and it may be said with reason, there has been no real injury”
- describing categories of rules applied in different jurisdictions
- characterizing the right to just compensation as a “fundamental right”
- describing categories of rules applied in different jurisdictions
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McReynolds
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.