Skip to main content

McCoy v. State

Citations

  • 810 S.E.2d 487

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “In light of the strong evidence of guilt, there is no reasonable probability that the outcome of the trial would have been different had trial counsel utilized alternative impeachment evidence.”
  • trial counsel’s failure to impeach witness with particular information did not result in prejudice where such information had “only marginal impeachment value” and the evidence of guilt was strong
  • no prejudice from trial counsel’s failure to impeach witness with prior testimony because the inconsistencies at issue were explored in detail during cross-examination and other witnesses testified similarly regarding the manner in which the defendant shot the victim
  • con- cluding appellant failed to show prejudice because “even if trial counsel had engaged in additional impeachment . . . there were still two other eyewitnesses who knew [appellant], identified him as the shooter, and gave similar descriptions of how he shot the victim”
  • evidence with marginal impeachment value does not establish prejudice
  • evidence with marginal impeachment value does not establish prejudice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hunstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.