McCoy v. Pepersack

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• distinguishing Keck based on the fact that “diamonds were not contraband,” and defendant in Keck, therefore, could easily have been confused over what law he had violated
• indictment was valid even though it did not specify what law had been violated
• government not required to prove defendant’s knowledge of quantity of drugs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).