McCoy v. Pennsylvania Power and Light Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• former nuclear plant operator's loss of security clearance rendered him not qualified under ADA because maintaining security clearance was essential part of job
• “[The company] could make no ‘reasonable accommodation’ that would have allowed plaintiff to remain in his former position and retain his security clearance without compromising its obligation imposed by NRC.”
• “[I]t is apparent as a matter of law that plaintiff is not a qualified individual with a disability within the meaning of the ADA, since his disability precludes him from retaining the security clearance necessary to perform his former job.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).