Skip to main content
· 3/14/2012

McCoy v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.

Citations

  • 858 F. Supp. 2d 639
  • 2012 WL 873352
  • 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34671

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[E]ven though it was brought up for the first time in its response to the Motion to Remand, [the removing defendant’s] improper joinder argument was not waived.”
  • “[T]he federal pleading standard under Twombly and Iqbal is arguably more stringent than the Texas “fair notice” requirement.”
  • “[E]ven though it was brought up for the first time in its response to the Motion to Remand, [the removing defendant’s] improper joinder argument was not waived.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Copenhaver

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.