McCoy v. McCoy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Ex parte orders are condemned by this Court except when justified by exigent circumstances.”
• Procedural bar of error preservation applies equally to constitutional errors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Charest v. Charest
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1997-12-22· cited 7×
• Peterson Outdoor Advertising Corp. v. Beaufort County
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1987-04-06· cited 6×
• Orangeburg County Department of Social Services v. Harley
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1990-05-03· cited 5×
• Glanton v. Glanton
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1994-04-25· cited 5×
• State v. Keesee
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1997-07-28· cited 1×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Mathis v. South Carolina State Highway Department
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1973-04-04· cited 86×
• McSwain v. Holmes
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1977-08-29· cited 14×
• Bobo Brothers, Inc. v. South Carolina Tax Commission
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1978-05-17· cited 3×
• Edwards v. Harris
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1983-06-21· cited 3×