McCoy v. Mayr Bros. Logging

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that it is presumed that the legislature acted purposely when it includes specific language from one portion of a statute and excludes it from another
• observing that the testimony of witnesses at congressional hearings “may not reflect [the views] of the legislators who actually voted on the bill”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).