McCoy v. Hoffmeister

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that non-moving party should have received an opportunity to correct the deficiency in an expert affidavit as “summary judgment should not be granted because of technical deficiencies in the non-movant’s affidavit”
• trial court erred in denying motion to amend affidavit to include expert’s qualification to testify to matters contained in affidavit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).