Fifth Circuit· 2/17/2000
McCoy v. Hernandez
Citations
- 203 F.3d 371
- 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 2279
- 2000 WL 124353
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that if the district court has not decided the issue of qualified immunity before trial, then “the defense [of qualified immunity] goes to the jury which must then determine the objective legal reasonableness of the officers’ conduct”
- if the court has not decided the issue prior to trial, “the jury . . . determine[s] the objective legal reasonableness of the officers’ conduct”
- if the court has not decided the issue prior to trial, “the jury . . . determine[s] the objective legal reasonableness of the officers’ conduct”
- if the court has not decided the issue prior to trial, “the jury . . . determine[s] the objective legal reasonableness of the officers’ conduct”
- reaching same result regarding an Illinois officer
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wiener, Stewart
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Walczyk v. RioSecond Circuit· 2007-08-01· cited 426×
- Curley v. KlemThird Circuit· 2002-08-02· cited 364×
- Porter v. EppsFifth Circuit· 2011-09-28· cited 331×
- Curley v. KlemThird Circuit· 2007-08-24· cited 307×
- Maria Morales v. Sonya FryNinth Circuit· 2017-10-16· cited 151×
- Gibbs v. GrimmetteFifth Circuit· 2001-06-15· cited 130×
- Carswell v. Borough of HomesteadThird Circuit· 2004-08-20· cited 124×
- Thomas E. West v. Nabors Drilling Usa, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 2003-05-20· cited 119×
- Conner v. Travis CountyFifth Circuit· 2000-05-03· cited 90×
- Keylon v. City of AlbuquerqueTenth Circuit· 2008-08-05· cited 89×
- Tucker v. City of ShreveportFifth Circuit· 2021-05-18· cited 86×
- Kokesh v. CurleeFifth Circuit· 2021-09-21· cited 37×
- United States v. SinghFifth Circuit· 2001-08-10· cited 36×
- Waganfeald v. GusmanFifth Circuit· 2012-03-12· cited 34×
- Ramirez v. KillianFifth Circuit· 2024-08-15· cited 21×
- Guion v. Sims (In re Sims)S.D. Texas· 2012-08-27· cited 19×
- Gamble v. BrowningMissouri Court of Appeals· 2012-06-29· cited 14×
- Mahnke v. GarriganSeventh Circuit· 2011-04-13· cited 13×
- Holmes v. ReddochFifth Circuit· 2024-09-06· cited 8×
- Potts v. HillSixth Circuit· 2003-10-02· cited 7×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court· 1984-01-23· cited 3,103×
- Illinois v. RodriguezSupreme Court· 1990-06-21· cited 2,581×
- HECI Exploration Co. v. NeelTexas Supreme Court· 1999-02-04· cited 576×
- Sysco Food Services, Inc. v. TrapnellTexas Supreme Court· 1995-02-16· cited 475×
- James Snyder, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Sidney Trepagnier, City of New Orleans, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeFifth Circuit· 1998-05-27· cited 338×
- Raymond Louis Bender v. James A. BrumleyFifth Circuit· 1993-08-24· cited 202×
- Leland Patzner v. Joyce Burkett A/K/A Joyce McLaughlin Deborah Myerchin and Stutsman County, North Dakota, a Political SubdivisionEighth Circuit· 1985-12-26· cited 132×
- Charles Booker v. James Ward and Thomas Kelly, Chicago Police DetectivesSeventh Circuit· 1996-08-29· cited 117×
- Stafford v. True Temper SportsFifth Circuit· 1997-09-25· cited 55×
- Davis v. EideSupreme Court· 1971-10-12· cited 41×
- Barton's Disposal Service, Inc. v. Tiger Corp., D/B/A Southwest Disposal, Inc. And Pine Hill LandfillFifth Circuit· 1990-01-03· cited 37×
- Duncan v. ClementsEighth Circuit· 1984-09-17· cited 37×
- Camilli v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaSupreme Court· 1997-02-18· cited 36×
- Kinslow v. RatzlaffTenth Circuit· 1998-10-15· cited 34×
- Elmer Davis AKA Robert Brown v. Leroy Eide, Detective-Police OfficeNinth Circuit· 1971-03-24· cited 33×
- Medearis v. MillerNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1981-05-28· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.