Skip to main content
· 7/6/2000

McCoy v. Gibson

Citations

  • 52 Va. Cir. 400
  • 2000 Va. Cir. LEXIS 302

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that because “Petitioner cannot avail himself of § 2255(e)’s saving clause . . . the district court lacked jurisdiction over Petitioner’s § 2241 petition.”
  • “A collateral attack on the validity of a federal conviction or sentence generally must be brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2255.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McGrath

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.