Skip to main content
· 10/18/2002

McCown v. Estate of Seidell

Citations

  • 831 So. 2d 218
  • 2002 WL 31322541

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The defendant does not contest the amount of past expenses.... Thus, we note that because only the future medical and future lost wage claims are at issue, the trial on damages shall be limited to same.” (citing Owens, 816 So.2d at 572)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pleus

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.